Here it is: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/3376. Would changing to ls be back on the table?
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 9:41:55 AM UTC-7, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > There are POSIX standards for new programming language function names? But > yes, ls() could be a better name. > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Adrian Lewis <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> > You can find a thread/issue where this is discussed. Some group decided >> to call it readdir() and like it more. I just got used to it. I think it's >> silly, but it's just syntax. >> >> I thought it might be an idea to stick with POSIX standards. >> >> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 4:40:03 PM UTC+1, Chris Rackauckas >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 7:36:18 AM UTC-7, Jacob Quinn wrote: >>>> >>>> readdir() >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Adrian Lewis <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In the filesystem package, if we have pwd() and cd(), why do we not >>>>> have ls()? >>>>> >>>>> Aidy >>>>> >>>> >>>> >
