... and we're always looking for new contributors to JuliaAstro <http://juliaastro.github.io/> for commonly-used functionality!
- Kyle On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Tim Holy <tim.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, June 17, 2015 12:00:02 PM Charles Novaes de Santana wrote: > > Did I hear AstroJulia? :) > > There's already the reverse: > https://github.com/JuliaAstro > > > > > Best, > > > > Charles > > > > On 16 June 2015 at 14:38, Daniel Carrera <dcarr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I would love to see the paper when it comes out. I cannot use your code > > > directly because I need to do a direct NBody rather than a tree code > (I am > > > modelling planetary systems). But it's nice to see another astronomer > > > using > > > Julia. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Daniel. > > > > > > On 16 June 2015 at 08:28, Ariel Keselman <skar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> FYI just since NBody was mentioned -- I wrote a gravitational NBody > tree > > >> code with parallel shared memory execution. I run it with many > millions > > >> of > > >> particles and I'm very pleased with the results. They are comparable > (or > > >> even faster) than some very popular C codes (e.g. Gadget2). I'm > working > > >> on > > >> a paper currently, will publish a package once everything is cleaned > up, > > >> documented, etc. > > > > > > -- > > > When an engineer says that something can't be done, it's a code phrase > > > that means it's not fun to do. > >
