`killall -USR1 julia` On Sun Nov 30 2014 at 2:36:37 AM Airhead Bit <[email protected]> wrote:
> Finished compiling, Lots of warnings, %CPU at 299~310, Used your below > test and mine is the same. > How can we find what is spinning all the CPU cycles? > > > <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-ZtUw4ml2dXc/VHrI7joXJhI/AAAAAAAAAFs/VGb5yUeYq-8/s1600/htop.JPG> > > > On Saturday, November 29, 2014 9:17:33 PM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: > >> However, upon building, it looks ok, and peakflops() which was crashing >> for me before works fine now. >> >> julia> Base.LinAlg.BlasInt >> Int32 >> >> julia> Base.USE_BLAS64 >> false >> >> >> -viral >> >> >> >> > On 30-Nov-2014, at 9:31 am, Viral Shah <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Interestingly, I get the same error now. I had cleaned out the whole >> openblas directory before starting the build. >> > >> > -viral >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 30-Nov-2014, at 6:14 am, Isaiah Norton <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> You will probably need to do `make -C deps clean-openblas` first (or >> just remove the openblas-0.2.12 subdirectory). >> >> >> > >> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Airhead Bit <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> git pull >> >> verified that ARM.inc was updated with USE_BLAS64=0 >> >> Same error message : ErrorException("BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with >> 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build >> Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.") >> >> Unit still compiling. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Saturday, November 29, 2014 1:03:32 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: >> >> I added USE_BLAS64=0 to ARM.inc. Could you git pull and try again? >> >> >> >> -viral >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 29-Nov-2014, at 1:01 pm, Airhead Bit <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include >> ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 >> stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. >> >>> No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. >> >>> Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, >> 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. >> >>> >> >>> Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? >> >>> Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: >> >>> Just finished compiling one Error: >> >>> Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: >> >>> ErrorException("BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer >> support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with >> USE_BLAS64=0.") >> >>> exports.jl >> >>> >> >>> Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... >> >>> >> >>> root@radxa:~/julia# make testall >> >>> JULIA test/all >> >>> Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. >> >>> exiting. >> >>> Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. >> >>> exiting. >> >>> Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. >> >>> exiting. >> >>> Worker 5 terminated. >> >>> Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. >> >>> >> >>> Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% >> until I killed the terminal >> >>> I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in >> the Make.user file. >> >>> >> >>> Any other ideas for a build? >> >>> Any ideas on how to tell what is sucking all the CPU? >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >>
