Finished compiling, Lots of warnings, %CPU at 299~310, Used your below test and mine is the same. How can we find what is spinning all the CPU cycles?
<https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-ZtUw4ml2dXc/VHrI7joXJhI/AAAAAAAAAFs/VGb5yUeYq-8/s1600/htop.JPG> On Saturday, November 29, 2014 9:17:33 PM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: > > However, upon building, it looks ok, and peakflops() which was crashing > for me before works fine now. > > julia> Base.LinAlg.BlasInt > Int32 > > julia> Base.USE_BLAS64 > false > > > -viral > > > > > On 30-Nov-2014, at 9:31 am, Viral Shah <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > > Interestingly, I get the same error now. I had cleaned out the whole > openblas directory before starting the build. > > > > -viral > > > > > > > >> On 30-Nov-2014, at 6:14 am, Isaiah Norton <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> > >> You will probably need to do `make -C deps clean-openblas` first (or > just remove the openblas-0.2.12 subdirectory). > >> > >> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Airhead Bit <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> git pull > >> verified that ARM.inc was updated with USE_BLAS64=0 > >> Same error message : ErrorException("BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with > 32-bit integer support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build > Julia with USE_BLAS64=0.") > >> Unit still compiling. > >> > >> > >> On Saturday, November 29, 2014 1:03:32 AM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote: > >> I added USE_BLAS64=0 to ARM.inc. Could you git pull and try again? > >> > >> -viral > >> > >> > >> > >>> On 29-Nov-2014, at 1:01 pm, Airhead Bit <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Yes, followed the directions made a Make.user added the include > ARM.inc if I had not I don't think the compile would have completed, no x86 > stuff on the Radxa box where I compiled it. > >>> No, I don't think an ARMv8 would even run ARM7 code, not sure. > >>> Radxa Rock Pro is ARM7 hfp with an ARM9 (quad core ARM7) 2GB memory, > 8GB Flash, desktop box, nice for working with Android. > >>> > >>> Should I add USE_BLAS64=0 to the Make.user and re-compile? > >>> Is there a way to have make testall load juliadebug test/all? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:18:39 AM UTC-7, Airhead Bit wrote: > >>> Just finished compiling one Error: > >>> Warning: error initializing module LinAlg: > >>> ErrorException("BLAS and LAPACK are compiled with 32-bit integer > support, but Julia expects 64-bit integers. Please build Julia with > USE_BLAS64=0.") > >>> exports.jl > >>> > >>> Julia works at the prompt but: TOP shows 400% CPU... > >>> > >>> root@radxa:~/julia# make testall > >>> JULIA test/all > >>> Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. > >>> exiting. > >>> Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. > >>> exiting. > >>> Master process (id 1) could not connect within 60.0 seconds. > >>> exiting. > >>> Worker 5 terminated. > >>> Worker 4 terminated.Worker 2 terminated. > >>> > >>> Eventually I was left with two Julia process's that each took 198.n% > until I killed the terminal > >>> I'm going to build a clean system and build adding USE_BLAS64=0 in the > Make.user file. > >>> > >>> Any other ideas for a build? > >>> Any ideas on how to tell what is sucking all the CPU? > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
