Exactly, javascript runs on the client's browser. Ruby, PHP, ASP.NET etc. etc. all run on the server. There should be no conflict.
JK _____ From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Ray Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:05 PM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: why jQuery? jQuery should work with ANY back end language, since it is a font end language. On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:52 PM, zok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey, thanks for your answers. Doesn't jQuery work with Rails? Cause I think jQuery is more flexible and has the simler code. Right? Thanks zok On 3 Mrz., 05:02, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, I think that only YOU can make that choice for yourself. Each > developer has their own techniques/styles. We can't make judgements to > match your environment or habits.... :) > > Next, I think both have a future because they serve slightly different > needs and audiences. (IMO). jQuery seems to me to more useful for a web > developer or those building the not so simple interfaces. > Prototype/scriptaculous seems to be better for those who either a) use > Rails (this is changing though), b) look for the cut/paste solutions, or > c) don't need to go beyond the "simple" tasks. (i.e. web and graphic > designers with little JS experience) > > Now, that above is kind of a loaded statement and I expect lots of > rebuttals... :) But that's the way I see it. To be fair though > Prototype on it's own *could* be used for more, but for me at least it > gets in the way more often than not, though I haven't used it for bout a > year now... > > My random (and suspect) thoughts.... > > Shawn > > zok wrote: > > Hey, > > > what is going to have the best future: jQuery or Prototype > > (scriptaculous)? > > Maybe you can tell me a few differences and/or reasons for your > > joice... > > > Regards, > > zok
