jQuery should work with ANY back end language, since it is a font end language.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:52 PM, zok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey, > > thanks for your answers. > Doesn't jQuery work with Rails? Cause I think jQuery is more flexible > and has the simler code. Right? > > Thanks > zok > > On 3 Mrz., 05:02, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First, I think that only YOU can make that choice for yourself. Each > > developer has their own techniques/styles. We can't make judgements to > > match your environment or habits.... :) > > > > Next, I think both have a future because they serve slightly different > > needs and audiences. (IMO). jQuery seems to me to more useful for a web > > developer or those building the not so simple interfaces. > > Prototype/scriptaculous seems to be better for those who either a) use > > Rails (this is changing though), b) look for the cut/paste solutions, or > > c) don't need to go beyond the "simple" tasks. (i.e. web and graphic > > designers with little JS experience) > > > > Now, that above is kind of a loaded statement and I expect lots of > > rebuttals... :) But that's the way I see it. To be fair though > > Prototype on it's own *could* be used for more, but for me at least it > > gets in the way more often than not, though I haven't used it for bout a > > year now... > > > > My random (and suspect) thoughts.... > > > > Shawn > > > > zok wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > what is going to have the best future: jQuery or Prototype > > > (scriptaculous)? > > > Maybe you can tell me a few differences and/or reasons for your > > > joice... > > > > > Regards, > > > zok >
