Hi Erlend, Thanks again for your suggestions.
The question about the gif track, is that I was avoiding other settings and definition URL in CSS file. I want mantaining all the information about URL in the js file. It stay more flexible. I´m thinking about it. The questions aground #jquery-nnn is related an alternative for the generated code doesn´t conflict with any other. Is too large, I know. Maybe, I contraction for jquery (jq) can be good. A slideshow function? Hummmm, it´s possible. But, let´s walking in step by step. Regards. On Oct 15, 4:14 am, Erlend Schei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have played around quite heavily with 0.3 now. The code cleanup was > great, your code is very easy to follow! > > As you seem responsive to feedback, here's a few findings: > > 1) You should get rid of the 0.3-introduced ___just-anything-here.gif > consept. Although it's apparently working well, it introduces a lot of > http requests on hovering, as the browser will try to fetch ___just- > anything-here.gif from the current location on all hover state > changes. And browsers don't do too well on negative css cacheing (not > founds). Reintroduce the blank gif trick - that gif will be cached. > > 2) Would you consider the naming of the #jquery-nnn elements? It would > be great if they all started with #lightbox. Just seems cleaner. It's > really great that you moved the physical paths from the css to the > init of the lightbox. > > When showing the result code to my colleagues I get a lot of wow's! > They started requesting a slideshow function... ;) > > Again, great work! > > Erlend :)
