Hi, > Google take the *very* strong view of licence prolifiration and warned > me that if I didn't change back to one of the 8 licences that they > have listed my project would be thrown off their site.
Interesting. Doesn't the MIT license, which jQuery itself is licensed under, provide a max of freedom, except of course for keeping the license information and a reference to the original author? The latter seems absolutely appropriate if someone wants to use the author's work, and the disclaimer would keep any author from legal issues. So, while the WTFPL is an intruiging approach, wouldn't the MIT license achieve what you, and Blair have in mind when licensing under WTFPL? Bernd
