Just dual license with MIT and WTFPL! Google should accept, it'd be even less conflicting than MIT + GPL, since...WTF anyway? Well, that's what I recommend, but do wtf you want ;-) . Being the Creative Director for Double Rebel, I will have to research this maverick license. ...It's recognized by the FSF! Full speed ahead!
Charles doublerebel.com On Aug 15, 12:54 pm, Bernd Matzner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > Google take the *very* strong view of licence prolifiration and warned > > me that if I didn't change back to one of the 8 licences that they > > have listed my project would be thrown off their site. > > Interesting. Doesn't the MIT license, which jQuery itself is licensed > under, provide a max of freedom, except of course for keeping the > license information and a reference to the original author? The latter > seems absolutely appropriate if someone wants to use the author's > work, and the disclaimer would keep any author from legal issues. So, > while the WTFPL is an intruiging approach, wouldn't the MIT license > achieve what you, and Blair have in mind when licensing under WTFPL? > > Bernd
