i agree, but i saw hasClass() in the roadMap for 1.2. So, i thought you were adding some convenience methods. So thought i would give my .02 coz, this sometimes had a tendency to increase my code and decrease legibility with a lot of .lt(var + 1) and .gt(var - 1).
I, in particular don't have a problem with this, coz my version of jquery has these methods ;-). -GTG On 8/3/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Probably not since :le(3) is the same thing as :lt(4). > > --John > > On 8/3/07, Ganeshji Marwaha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > meantime, is there any possibility to add le() and ge() (for lesser than > or > > equal to and greater than or equal to). > > I am under the assumption it is not already there. > > > > -GTG > > > > > > On 8/3/07, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Huh... I should probably nuke :nth(). > > > > > > --John > > > > > > On 8/3/07, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > They're the same, so you can use whichever you prefer. > > > > > > > > From jquery.js: > > > > > > > > nth: "m[3]-0==i", > > > > eq: "m[3]-0==i", > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --Karl > > > > _________________ > > > > Karl Swedberg > > > > www.englishrules.com > > > > www.learningjquery.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Matt Penner wrote: > > > > I've searched the groups but I can't seem to find any related talk > on > > this. > > > > > > > > What, if any, is the difference between using :eq(n) and :nth(n)? > > > > > > > > I'd like to know before I start standardizing on one or the other. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt Penner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
