Selectors are staying, the methods are going. --John
On 8/3/07, Ganeshji Marwaha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > quick question... are the :eq() etal... selectors gonna stay? or are they > going to be removed as well. > > > -GTG > > On 8/3/07, John Resig < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well, it should be noted that we're remove .lt() .gt() and .eq() in > > favor of a new .slice() method, which will be able to produce > > identical results (and even better). > > > > --John > > > > On 8/3/07, Ganeshji Marwaha < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i agree, but i saw hasClass() in the roadMap for 1.2. > > > So, i thought you were adding some convenience methods. So thought i > would > > > give my .02 coz, this sometimes had a tendency to increase my code and > > > decrease legibility with a lot of .lt(var + 1) and .gt(var - 1). > > > > > > I, in particular don't have a problem with this, coz my version of > jquery > > > has these methods ;-). > > > > > > > > > -GTG > > > > > > On 8/3/07, John Resig < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Probably not since :le(3) is the same thing as :lt(4). > > > > > > > > --John > > > > > > > > On 8/3/07, Ganeshji Marwaha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > meantime, is there any possibility to add le() and ge() (for lesser > than > > > or > > > > > equal to and greater than or equal to). > > > > > I am under the assumption it is not already there. > > > > > > > > > > -GTG > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/3/07, John Resig < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Huh... I should probably nuke :nth(). > > > > > > > > > > > > --John > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/3/07, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > They're the same, so you can use whichever you prefer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From jquery.js: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nth: "m[3]-0==i", > > > > > > > eq: "m[3]-0==i", > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --Karl > > > > > > > _________________ > > > > > > > Karl Swedberg > > > > > > > www.englishrules.com > > > > > > > www.learningjquery.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Matt Penner wrote: > > > > > > > I've searched the groups but I can't seem to find any related > talk > > > on > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What, if any, is the difference between using :eq(n) and > :nth(n)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to know before I start standardizing on one or the > other. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Matt Penner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
