Hi Victor, I apologise for having interpreted too much into your comment.
2018-01-24 21:25 GMT+01:00 Victor Bronstein <[email protected]>: > Oh Lukas, please don't be offended by my awkward sarcastic humour! I just > love jOOQ - the only thing I regret is that when I felt a need for > something like this somewhere in 2010 I didn't push enough the POC I had. > It was like 0.01% of what is there in jOOQ now but the intent was the same. > I see > By the way if you think I could help developing this, please let me know! > If you have a direction but don't have the time, please give me a few hints > and I'll try my luck! > Well, guess what :) Reviewing might take more time than actually doing it. Sure, you can try, but I don't have a "direction" yet, so you'd have to figure that out yourself right now. Once I have a "direction" (which is probably most of the work), implementing it is probably that much of an effort anymore. Rest assured, I do find that feature very useful and dearly missing as well, so I'll definitely spend some time soon investigating how this can be expressed in a meaningful API. Thanks, Lukas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
