Oh Lukas, please don't be offended by my awkward sarcastic humour! I just love jOOQ - the only thing I regret is that when I felt a need for something like this somewhere in 2010 I didn't push enough the POC I had. It was like 0.01% of what is there in jOOQ now but the intent was the same.
Anyway, I'm so happy you made it happen and please accept my apologies if my remark was misplaced! By the way if you think I could help developing this, please let me know! If you have a direction but don't have the time, please give me a few hints and I'll try my luck! Sincerely, Victor On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 1:35:24 PM UTC+2, Lukas Eder wrote: > > Victor > > 2018-01-24 11:30 GMT+01:00 Victor Bronstein <[email protected] > <javascript:>>: > >> Thanks Lukas! >> That's a pity... an issue open since 2012 doesn't sound encouraging :) >> > > Well, there are many ways to see a 99% full glass, including 1% empty. :) > > Check out the release notes since 2012: > https://www.jooq.org/notes > > Tons of activity in the past 6 years. Unfortunately, this one that you > would have liked now isn't there yet. Like every product and project, > prioritisation is essential. So, this particular idea has been sitting > there since 2012 and I dare say that not too many people have enquired > about it compared to a variety of other functionality, thus the > prioritisation. > > Which doesn't mean, we cannot change that. > > Would changing the constructor of TableImpl to use the logic from >> org.jooq.impl.Tools#aliased make it possible or it would violate the >> type safety? (In order to remove the extra wrapper created) >> > > I'll have to investigate this first. Will get back to you with more info, > soon - hopefully by the end of the week. > > Cheers, > Lukas > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
