[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17312609#comment-17312609
]
John Roesler commented on KAFKA-12593:
--------------------------------------
Hi [~jmclean] ,
I don't know if you will get pinged by this comment, but I'd greatly appreciate
your input on my proposed fix: [https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10452]
I'm not a lawyer, but I've been reading over the ASF documentation. This seems
to be in a weird grey area. If we were re-distributing source code, we should
clearly maintain any copyright notices. But this code was actually submitted to
Kafka by Lightbend under the terms of our CLA, so it seems like it should never
have had that copyright notice to begin with. Since then, numerous
non-Lightbend contributors have submitted changes to those files; I'm not sure
how much of the original code is still present.
It seems wrong to simply drop the notices, though, so I added a mention of it
in the NOTICE file.
Do you think this is the right approach?
Thanks for your help.
-John
> The Streams-Scala contains the wrong license header
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-12593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12593
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: John Roesler
> Assignee: John Roesler
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.8.0, 2.7.1, 2.6.2
>
>
> Thanks to [~jmclean] for raising this issue in the mailing list thread:
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2df54c11c10d3d38443054998bc7dd92d34362641733c2fb7c579b50%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E]
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
