mjsax commented on code in PR #15790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15790#discussion_r1619318104


##########
streams/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/streams/processor/internals/SinkNode.java:
##########
@@ -58,8 +60,21 @@ public void addChild(final ProcessorNode<Void, Void, ?, ?> 
child) {
     public void init(final InternalProcessorContext<Void, Void> context) {
         super.init(context);
         this.context = context;
-        keySerializer = prepareKeySerializer(keySerializer, context, 
this.name());
-        valSerializer = prepareValueSerializer(valSerializer, context, 
this.name());
+        try {
+            keySerializer = prepareKeySerializer(keySerializer, context, 
this.name());
+        } catch (final ConfigException e) {
+            throw new ConfigException(String.format("Failed to initialize key 
serdes for sink node %s", name()));
+        } catch (final StreamsException e) {

Review Comment:
   It's a corner case I would say -- also, we do wrap a log of exception as 
StreamsException throughout the whole code base, and given that we wrap the 
original `ConfigException` inside the StreamsException we would not lose 
information. It's just the idea to simplify the code a little bit.
   
   Let's hear what @cadonna or @ableegoldman think.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to