|
||||||||
|
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
||||||||
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
@Shannon, as you mentioned, your experience using "weekly builds" may have made you wary of using them. My experience on the other hand is slightly different in that the company I'm currently a part of does an agile weekly production release cycle of their cloud-based Software as a Service product. As a DevOps and Release Engineer, I am part of that process and we make sure to the extent possible that our weekly releases are stable. We have large companies using/hosted on our platform and our releases need to happen live without causing any noticeable downtime to our clients. So I am skewed towards the other end of the spectrum whereby I would generally trust a weekly release unless, as you mentioned, there is a "more visible warning". Nevertheless, I agree with you that if you want a stable and tested environment, go with the LTS release. I also agree with you that in general, the latest and greatest are not always the greatest. In fact, they'd probably be buggy and crash =)