So, you're not using XEmacs (which I am), but rather Gnu Emacs, so
there's no reason to compare further. I thought you had said you were
trying to get XEmacs to work, my mistake:
Your reports:
Emacs : GNU Emacs 21.2.1 (i686-pc-cygwin, X toolkit)
of 2004-03-22 on cm-test
Package: JDE version 2.3.5
Required packages: cedet-1.0beta2b
My report:
Emacs : XEmacs 21.4 (patch 16) "Corporate Culture" [Lucid]
(i686-pc-cygwin) of Mon Mar 14 2005 on francis
Package: JDE version 2.3.5
Required packages: cedet-1.0beta3
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]