Are you running search requests in a loop from more than 4 threads? If yes then this situation is ideal like Trejkaz said. Otherwise please describe your workload and explain why you think 100% CPU usage is not ideal.
Le mar. 3 janv. 2017 à 12:52, Rajnish kamboj <rajnishk7.i...@gmail.com> a écrit : > High CPU may be ideal, but 100% CPU utilization is not ideal. (We might be > missing very silly thing) > > More information on our environment: > Machine details: 4 vCPUs and 4 GB RAM > Search Load: ~200 simultaneous users searching requests. > Data set : 3.5 Million records (~ 2 GB index size). > > We reduced our data set to 25000, still CPU usage was very high, but > throughput increases. > > Please advice, if we are missing any Lucene recommendations? > > > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Trejkaz <trej...@trypticon.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Rajnish kamboj <rajnishk7.i...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > The CPU usage goes upto 100% during search. > > > > Isn't that ideal? Or would you prefer your searches to be slow, blocked > by > > I/O? > > > > TX > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > >
