4 Gb RAM for 4 CPU's may be too small. Try to increase the RAM to 16 Gb and load the Index in RAMDisk. That may help.
Op di 3 jan. 2017 om 12:52 schreef Rajnish kamboj <rajnishk7.i...@gmail.com> > High CPU may be ideal, but 100% CPU utilization is not ideal. (We might be > > missing very silly thing) > > > > More information on our environment: > > Machine details: 4 vCPUs and 4 GB RAM > > Search Load: ~200 simultaneous users searching requests. > > Data set : 3.5 Million records (~ 2 GB index size). > > > > We reduced our data set to 25000, still CPU usage was very high, but > > throughput increases. > > > > Please advice, if we are missing any Lucene recommendations? > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Trejkaz <trej...@trypticon.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Rajnish kamboj <rajnishk7.i...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > The CPU usage goes upto 100% during search. > > > > > > Isn't that ideal? Or would you prefer your searches to be slow, blocked > by > > > I/O? > > > > > > TX > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- Sent from Gmail IPad
