Hi Hoss, I read your article.
I have to review the solr-code but with the help of your pseudo-code I think I understand what goes on now. Thank you! Regards, Em Am 05.10.2011 20:19, schrieb Chris Hostetter: > > : > Presumably this query would fail, since you've only got three clauses. > : > Easy to verify. > : > : Seems like different behaviour compared to Solr. Probably Solr is > : intelligent enough to reduce the parameter to the maximum value if it is > : too large. > > correct, the dismax parser in solr is smart enough not to calculate an > illegal value for minNrShouldMatch using the mm param. > > : >> If so, what is the problem in Solr with Stopwords and the Dismax-Parser? > > the problem people sometimes have understanding the interaction of the dismax > parser and stopwords comes from using sotpwords in the analyzers > for *some* fields they are querying but not others, and then being > suprised that the stopwords are still part of their overall query (in the > fields where they didn't use them in their analyzer)... > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMax > http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2010/05/23/whats-a-dismax/ > > ...note in particula the "Where people tend to get tripped up..." para in > that blog post > > > -Hoss > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
