: > Presumably this query would fail, since you've only got three clauses. : > Easy to verify. : : Seems like different behaviour compared to Solr. Probably Solr is : intelligent enough to reduce the parameter to the maximum value if it is : too large.
correct, the dismax parser in solr is smart enough not to calculate an illegal value for minNrShouldMatch using the mm param. : >> If so, what is the problem in Solr with Stopwords and the Dismax-Parser? the problem people sometimes have understanding the interaction of the dismax parser and stopwords comes from using sotpwords in the analyzers for *some* fields they are querying but not others, and then being suprised that the stopwords are still part of their overall query (in the fields where they didn't use them in their analyzer)... https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMax http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2010/05/23/whats-a-dismax/ ...note in particula the "Where people tend to get tripped up..." para in that blog post -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
