> The FieldCache loads per segment, and the NRT reader is reloading only > new segments from disk, so yes, it's "smarter" about this caching in this > case.
Ok, so the cache is tied to the index, and not to any particular reader. The actual FieldCacheImpl keeps a mapping from Reader to its terms, so are the cached values shared just because the Readers actually wrap the same Indices, so the termDocs for all the readers are actually almost entirely the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
