The FieldCache loads per segment, and the NRT reader is reloading only new segments from disk, so yes, it's "smarter" about this caching in this case.
-jake On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:07 PM, tsuraan <tsur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is the cache used by sorting on strings separated by reader, or is it > a global thing? I'm trying to use the near-realtime search, and I > have a few indices with a million docs apiece. If I'm opening a new > reader every minute, am I going to have every term in every sort field > read into RAM for each reader that I have open? Or, is the cache > smarter about that, and at least the strings are interned, or does it > work completely differently from that? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
