Hi Michael, Michael Glavassevich schrieb: >> I understand that Xerces is doing nothing wrong here and I don't know >> what the XML Schema Working Group thinks about it, so there might be >> some more discussion with the authors of XML Schema needed (from what >> I've seen it's not mentioned in the XML Schema 1.1 WD either). > > The XML Schema WG does have a public comments mailing list [1] and > Bugzilla tracker [2]. It wouldn't hurt to raise this issue there. > Discussion with the WG might result in improvements to the spec.
Seems that this already has been discussed, results at [1]: > 3) Where we resolve relative URIs, they are absolutized using the > [base URI] property of the relevant element, as prescribed by the XML > Base spec. Unfortunately I was not able to find information on how to absolutize relative URIs in the most recent XML Schema 1.1 WD. But still, adding support for xml:base seems to be in line with the ideas of the WG. Philipp [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6011#c2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org
