Michael Glavassevich schrieb:
> Hi Philipp,
> 
> Philipp Wagner <philipp.wag...@med.uni-muenchen.de> wrote on 04/16/2009
> 02:26:36 AM:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Michael Glavassevich schrieb:
>> > The XML Schema specification [1] places no requirements on processors to
>> > support xml:base. It's not mentioned anywhere in the spec. So while
>> > Xerces doesn't support it in its schema processor I wouldn't necessarily
>> > call it a limitation.
>>
>> Thanks for your reponse. I already expected it to be that way :( Still,
>> the current behavior is confusing, as xml:base is considered for
>> XInclude but not for Schema inclusion, i.e. the same relative path
>> inside a XML document will resolve to two different locations when using
>> xml:base.
> 
> XInclude was developed much later and actually does reference xml:base
> so was clearer that we were supposed to do something there. If you're
> interested in seeing this apply to schema processing too, you should
> open a feature request [1].

I did at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1366

I understand that Xerces is doing nothing wrong here and I don't know
what the XML Schema Working Group thinks about it, so there might be
some more discussion with the authors of XML Schema needed (from what
I've seen it's not mentioned in the XML Schema 1.1 WD either).

Philipp

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org

Reply via email to