It should have been written by the producer/serializer of the XML document
if the carriage return is actually part of the document's content.

Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org

Aleksandr Kravets <akravets.w...@gmail.com> wrote on 03/02/2009 01:39:35
PM:

> So it would need to be replaced in place of carriage return manually?

> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Paul Gearon <gea...@ieee.org> wrote:
> I'm not saying that this is the answer to your problem, but the entity
> referred to here is:
>  &#x0D;
>
> Paul
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Aleksandr Kravets
> <akravets.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ok, I think I found an issue similar to mine, it is in this thread:
> > http://www.stylusstudio.com/xsllist/200404/post40600.html
> >
> > Particular line of interest to me is this:
> >
> > "BTW, if you want your attribute to have a carriage return, you can use
an
> > entity to express the carriage return, then it doesn't get normalized."
> >
> > So can someone explain what this means and how do I describe
theseentities?
> > May be I can insert them into XML before importing and letting parser
do its
> > work?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Aleksandr Kravets
<akravets.w...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Totally agree, but even if originating XML is corrected, there are
clients
> >> with wrong style XML that will use my application to import XML and in
such
> >> a case there is little I can do. So, is there a way to correct this
problem
> >> during the import?
> >>
> >> Thanks for your help,
> >> Alex
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:21 PM, <kesh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The purpose of an XML parser is to read correct XML. Get whoever's
> >>> generating that file to produce XML that expresses their intent
> >>> correctly,
> >>> or throw in a filtering stage that corrects their error.  Personally,
I
> >>> would apply a clue-by-four to the author of whatever's generating
that
> >>> document rather than trying to tolerate it, since they're just going
to
> >>> get themselves in deeper trouble later... but I understand that this
> >>> isn't
> >>> always possible.
> >>>
> >>> "The customer isn't always right. Unfortunately, the customer is
always
> >>> the one with the money."
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________________
> >>> "... Three things see no end: A loop with exit code done wrong,
> >>> A semaphore untested, And the change that comes along. ..."
> >>>  -- "Threes" Rev 1.1 - Duane Elms / Leslie Fish (
> >>> http://www.ovff.org/pegasus/songs/threes-rev-11.html)
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org
> >>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org

Reply via email to