[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18032509#comment-18032509
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-17771:
-----------------------------------
I definitely see your point [~janhoy] about having a 1-to-1 relation between
ticket and fix version. But the impression I have after many years following
this project is this is not something we have done consistently before, and I
am not personally a fan of added paperwork. I've been filing these jdk client
changes as "improvement", [~dsmiley] because from my developer's perspective
these have been more code refactoring projects rather than new things I've
built. My aim here is to give a drop-in replacement for something that already
exists.
> Have a CloudSolrClient that works with HttpJdkSolrClient
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-17771
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17771
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: James Dyer
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 10.0
>
> Time Spent: 1h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As of this writing, there is a CloudSolrClient with Jetty HttpClient
> dependency and another for Apache HttpClient. This issue proposes a solution
> for the JDK HttpClient, thus offering a dependency reduced client.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
