kotman12 commented on code in PR #2382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2382#discussion_r1840339347
##########
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/DebugComponent.java:
##########
@@ -115,6 +116,12 @@ public void process(ResponseBuilder rb) throws IOException
{
info.add("facet-debug", fdebug.getFacetDebugInfo());
}
+ ReverseSearchDebugInfo rsdebug =
+ (ReverseSearchDebugInfo)
(rb.req.getContext().get(ReverseSearchDebugInfo.KEY));
+ if (rsdebug != null) {
+ info.add("reverse-search-debug", rsdebug.getReverseSearchDebugInfo());
+ }
+
Review Comment:
I like it. It would be nice it you didn't have to use inheritance because it
makes "layering" debug components challenging (i.e. if the debug component
could iterate over other customInfoProviders to collect custom debug metrics..)
. But that's a hypothetical problem since nothing that requires this exists yet
and the DI mechanism in solr is a bit painful right now so doing composition is
probably messier.
One question I have is why not keep the `ReverseSearchDebugComponent` in the
default component list for the reverseSearchHandler? The searchHandler includes
`DebugComponent` in its default components so I would think we'd want to keep
that consistent.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
