alessandrobenedetti commented on PR #2489:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2489#issuecomment-2153161526

   > I haven't looked at this in detail but I'm wondering could we instead have 
a single 'q' query parser, that is itself a "query combiner" of its children 
clauses? Ultimately this would mean not needing all this special code in 
QueryComponent. I'm trying to make recommendations that "fit in" well with 
Solr's architecture; less bolted / hacked on.
   > 
   > CC @hossman I think you'd have good inputs on this one too
   
   In principle I agree, correct me if I'm wrong, your proposed solution means:
   1) a Lucene contribution to create a new query
   2) a Solr query parser to combine N queries into the new Lucene one?
   
   I would need to think and design this possible solution, but I have no idea 
when this will happen as I am afraid it would take a significant amount of 
time. (of course anyone is happy to help).
   
   Do you think it would make sense to start refining this contribution, bake 
it in so that users have this new possibility decently quickly and then 
iteratively replace it?
   
   It's not because I have a strong opinion on this, I am just realistically 
think what could bring value from my side, in accordance with my future 
availabilty.
   Happy to discuss! 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to