rseitz commented on PR #2445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2445#issuecomment-2100670514

   @epugh About the name, I started with `SecurityUtils` but it seemed to 
suggest a more general purpose than the intent of this class, and there are 
zookeeper and eclipse classes with that same name. Some other ideas that come 
to mind are `SampleSecurityJson`, `SecurityJsonTestUtils`, `SecurityJsonUtils`, 
`SecurityJsonConstants`, `SecurityConstants`, `SecurityTestConstants` and so 
on.  Some of those would mean a longer name for the actual string constant 
containing the json, for example, if we go with `SecurityConstants` as the 
class name, we'd need something like `SecurityConstants.SIMPLE_SECURITY_JSON`
   
   I figured that SecurityJson.SIMPLE was the most concise and someone could 
further understand the intent by seeing "util" in the package name and seeing 
that it's in the "test-framework" tree. If I had to pick one of the other 
options, I think I'd pick `SecurityJsonConstants`. Let me know if you have a 
preference or any other suggestions. Thanks for the review!
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to