epugh commented on PR #2229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2229#issuecomment-1915917826

   > > What jumped out at me is that we really abuse `GenericSolrRequest` all 
over the place. I also am hoping that as more of the V2 api's come online, we 
could reduce the places that we use `GenericSolrRequest`, kind of like how in 
some places you could swap in a `QueryRequest` in this PR!
   > 
   > Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. There's a few times we use 
GenericSolrRequest as a way to hit a custom test endpoint or something like 
that, but that's definitely the exception and not the rule. 90% of these GSR 
usages are bandaids covering up the fact that we're missing SolrJ coverage for 
particular APIs.
   > 
   > I think these invocations would be a great place to start sneaking in some 
of our v2 SolrRequest objects, as you suggested. (Would be a great newdev 
ticket!)
   
   Totally agree on getting some of the new v2 objects in!   Also, I wonder if 
looking at uses of GenericSolrRequest would provide insight into which v2 apis 
should be prioritized?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to