dsmiley commented on code in PR #1504:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1504#discussion_r1162183932


##########
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/update/processor/DistributedUpdateProcessor.java:
##########
@@ -331,7 +342,7 @@ protected boolean versionAdd(AddUpdateCommand cmd) throws 
IOException {
 
     boolean isReplayOrPeersync =
         (cmd.getFlags() & (UpdateCommand.REPLAY | UpdateCommand.PEER_SYNC)) != 
0;
-    boolean leaderLogic = isLeader && !isReplayOrPeersync;
+    boolean leaderLogic = 
leaderLogicWithVersionIntegrityCheck(isReplayOrPeersync, versionOnUpdate);

Review Comment:
   My concern is better expressed as related to aspects of the contents of 
leaderLogicWithVersionIntegrityCheck().  I like that it throws an exception 
when versionOnUpdate = 0 when we expect it to not be 0.  But I don't like 
changing the criteria for "leaderLogic".



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to