[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646207#comment-17646207
]
Kevin Risden commented on SOLR-16129:
-------------------------------------
Are there still plans to implement this? SOLR-16099 upgraded to Jetty 10.0.13
which fixes the underlying Jetty bug as reported.
> Solr specific InputStreamResponseListener to prevent client threads from
> hanging forever
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16129
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16129
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter
> Assignee: Chris M. Hostetter
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-16129.patch
>
>
> This issue tracks the implementation of workaround I suggested for SOLR-16099
> - it does not _fix_ the underlying bug (which as of this writting doesn't
> have an identified root cause) but it does ensure that client threads which
> encounter the bug won't hang forever...
> {quote}One thing we may want to consider (in Solr) is replacing our usage of
> {{InputStreamResponseListener}} with a variant implementation that uses a
> "timeout" instead of an unlimited {{wait()}} (along the lines of a [spin-off
> jetty enhancement issue|https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/7259]
> one of the jetty devs filed). We could probably (with some effort) tweak the
> impacted Solr APIs to propogate the (remaining) {{timeAllowed}} (if that
> option was specified) down to this class – and/or have an "extreme" default
> (ie: 30min) just to prevent threads from sticking around forever.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
