cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/313#discussion_r718467688
##########
File path: solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/update/SolrIndexConfigTest.java
##########
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ public void testSortingMPSolrIndexConfigCreation() throws
Exception {
final Sort expected = new Sort(new SortField(expectedFieldName,
expectedFieldType, expectedFieldSortDescending));
final Sort actual = sortingMergePolicy.getSort();
assertEquals("SortingMergePolicy.getSort", expected, actual);
+ assertEquals("indexSort", expected, iwc.getIndexSort());
Review comment:
Yes, and perhaps changing some `indexConfig` parameters after collection
creation would be fine but not so for others. Also the merge policy (factory)
configuration is nested, not sure if config-api would easily support that.
Added a new method, modelled on the existing sorting-merge-policy one that
will go away with sorting merge policy. There is existing `TestSegmentSorting`
coverage w.r.t. index sorting working in a test, so it might make sense to tap
into that somehow?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
