ctargett edited a comment on pull request #190: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/190#issuecomment-867835788
> The -prerelease5 suffix should probably not be there (and will not either of course in the final release), not sure if it needs change. No, they shouldn't need to change. The Lucene version comes from `versions.props` so when that's right for 9.0 it will be right in the 9.0 Ref Guide. This has been true forever - the URL is always wrong until the javadocs exist. > Here is the list of broken links I didn't change anything here, so presumably these are also all 40x in the current Ref Guide. I'm not sure how fixing them relates to approving the overall content re-organization? One could fix them all in the current Ref Guide in `main` right now, or pre-9.0 release, and in branch_8x, etc. (Edit to add: I did actually spot-check a couple from the 8.8 Guide and they are broken there, so this needs to be a separate issue IMO. And if we expect all Ref Guide edits to pass a link audit, then perhaps another separate issue should tackle adding that to the build process.) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
