cpoerschke commented on a change in pull request #151: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/151#discussion_r645876581
########## File path: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/SortedHitQueueManager.java ########## @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ +package org.apache.solr.handler.component; + +import org.apache.lucene.search.SortField; +import org.apache.solr.search.AbstractReRankQuery; +import org.apache.solr.search.RankQuery; +import org.apache.solr.search.SortSpec; + +/** + * This class is used to manage the possible multiple SortedHitQueues that we need during mergeIds( ). + * Multiple queues are needed, if reRanking is used. + * + * If reRanking is disabled, only the queue is used. + * If reRanking is enabled, the top reRankDocsSize documents are added to the reRankQueue, all other documents are + * collected in the queue. + */ +public class SortedHitQueueManager { + private final ShardFieldSortedHitQueue queue; + private final ShardFieldSortedHitQueue reRankQueue; + private final int reRankDocsSize; + + public SortedHitQueueManager(SortField[] sortFields, SortSpec ss, ResponseBuilder rb) { + final RankQuery rankQuery = rb.getRankQuery(); + + if(rb.getRankQuery() != null && rankQuery instanceof AbstractReRankQuery){ Review comment: > ... this pull request to fix for use cases with a score-free sort and future pull request(s) for use cases whose sort contains a score ... I think something like this could work: ```suggestion boolean hasScoreSortField = false; for (SortField sortField : sortFields) { if (SortField.FIELD_SCORE.equals(sortField)) { hasScoreSortField = true; break; } } if(rb.getRankQuery() != null && rankQuery instanceof AbstractReRankQuery && hasScoreSortField == false){ ``` What do you think? _(And no time pressure or rush at all to consider this idea, I just wanted post it here today to perhaps help us shift away for the "bit sad" conclusion of the "The current solution only works if ..." conversation above.)_ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
