[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17338826#comment-17338826
]
Alan Woodward commented on SOLR-15389:
--------------------------------------
Hey [~mdrob], I think your approach above is the most sensible. I don't think
we guarantee anything about string representations of queries, but we do
guarantee that identical Query objects should compare as equal (given that we
require it for query caching, efficient boolean rewriting, etc), so that should
be what Solr is checking. If you're worried about verbosity then maybe add
some simple factory methods?
> Certain tests rely on DisjunctionMaxQuery clause order
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15389
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15389
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Test
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Mike Drob
> Priority: Major
>
> Broken by LUCENE-9940
> Test failures e.g.
> org.apache.solr.search.TestSolrQueryParser.testSynonymQueryStyle
> {noformat}
> org.junit.ComparisonFailure:
> <(t_pick_best_foo:[tabbi | t_pick_best_foo:cat | t_pick_best_foo:felin] |
> t_pick_best_foo:a...>
> <(t_pick_best_foo:[felin | t_pick_best_foo:cat | t_pick_best_foo:tabbi] |
> t_pick_best_foo:a...>
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
