rdblue commented on code in PR #3117: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3117#discussion_r1968544104
########## parquet-variant/src/main/java/org/apache/parquet/variant/Variant.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,444 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + * specific language governing permissions and limitations + * under the License. + */ +package org.apache.parquet.variant; + +import static java.time.temporal.ChronoField.*; +import static org.apache.parquet.variant.VariantUtil.*; + +import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonFactory; +import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonGenerator; +import java.io.CharArrayWriter; +import java.io.IOException; +import java.math.BigDecimal; +import java.time.Instant; +import java.time.LocalDate; +import java.time.ZoneId; +import java.time.ZoneOffset; +import java.time.format.DateTimeFormatter; +import java.time.format.DateTimeFormatterBuilder; +import java.time.temporal.ChronoUnit; +import java.util.Arrays; +import java.util.Base64; +import java.util.Locale; + +/** + * This Variant class holds the Variant-encoded value and metadata binary values. + */ +public final class Variant { + final byte[] value; + final byte[] metadata; + /** + * The starting index into `value` where the variant value starts. This is used to avoid copying + * the value binary when reading a sub-variant in the array/object element. + */ + final int pos; + + public Variant(byte[] value, byte[] metadata) { + this(value, metadata, 0); + } + + Variant(byte[] value, byte[] metadata, int pos) { + this.value = value; + this.metadata = metadata; + this.pos = pos; + // There is currently only one allowed version. + if (metadata.length < 1 || (metadata[0] & VERSION_MASK) != VERSION) { + throw malformedVariant(); + } + } + + public byte[] getValue() { + if (pos == 0) return value; + int size = valueSize(value, pos); + checkIndex(pos + size - 1, value.length); + return Arrays.copyOfRange(value, pos, pos + size); + } + + public byte[] getMetadata() { Review Comment: > Where do we assume that `metadata` and `value` are in the same array? I don't think we are making that assumption. I was referring to the possible values and intent for the `pos` argument and trying to understand your intent from this code. But that isn't the point I was trying to make. The point here is that it is more common in Java to pass byte arrays with offset and length, rather than requiring that arrays are copied before passing them in. I think the use of 0-offset byte arrays is limiting. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@parquet.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@parquet.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@parquet.apache.org
