nandakumar131 commented on PR #7862: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/7862#issuecomment-2675994701
> Having something in the raft log and not applying it & not having a txn in raft log is one and the same. Why have different states? The difference is `relying on quorum` vs `need all the replicas` to close a QUASI_CLOSED Container. I agree that we are not in a good place right now to close a Container in QUASI_CLOSED state based on quorum, but that should not be the reason to add more code which will not allow us to use quorum based closing logic in future. > I believe QUASI_CLOSED containers are containers which have missed a bunch of txns irrespective of it being in the raft log or not. If that's the case, we don't even need Ratis. We can have a implementation without Ratis by having a static leader node and all the transactions can go through that leader and replicated to followers. If we don't want to rely on Ratis quorum, we can actually simplify the flow by removing Ratis. > Atleast the current implementation is so. The current implementation has missed handling few failure cases, we should fix them. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@ozone.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@ozone.apache.org
