[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16120361#comment-16120361
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4224:
--------------------------------------
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2051#discussion_r132257197
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-client-dto/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/dto/ProcessGroupDTO.java
---
@@ -200,4 +204,13 @@ public void setInactiveRemotePortCount(Integer
inactiveRemotePortCount) {
this.inactiveRemotePortCount = inactiveRemotePortCount;
}
+
+ @ApiModelProperty("The variables that are configured for the Process
Group")
+ public Map<String, String> getVariables() {
+ return variables;
+ }
+
+ public void setVariables(final Map<String, String> variables) {
--- End diff --
Also, can we update the documentation to indicate that this only includes
the variables defined at this Process Group?
> Add Variable Registry at Process Group level
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-4224
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4224
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core Framework
> Reporter: Mark Payne
> Assignee: Mark Payne
>
> Currently, NiFi exposes a variable registry that is configurable by adding
> the name of a properties file to nifi.properties and then treating the
> referenced properties file as key/value pairs for the variable registry.
> This, however, is very limiting, as it provides a global scope for all
> variables, and it requires a restart of NiFi in order to pick up any updates
> to the file. We should expose a Process Group-level Variable Registry.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
