Re: [issues] Why women should have equality/equivilency

[curious]

ack more reading ;) 

thanks,
Chris

 /"\  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
 \ /   ASCII Ribbon Campaign      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  X   - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail     http://www.curious.org/
 / \  - NO Word docs in e-mail    "This quote is false." -anon

On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Emily Ratliff wrote:

> As curious stated:
> > (I'm researching standard oil, the
> > findings of fact from the judge, and some essays I found on each side of
> > the microsoft issue)
> While you're researching, study up on IBM's antitrust case:
> 
> 
> http://www.essential.org/antitrust/ibm/
> 
> http://www.essential.org/antitrust/ms/1984ibmeu.html
> 
> Emily
> 
> ************
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.linuxchix.org
> 


************
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.linuxchix.org