[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14527314#comment-14527314
]
Mithun Radhakrishnan commented on HIVE-9736:
--------------------------------------------
Thanks for the review, Chris.
Would it be alright if we moved the {{combine()}} code to a common place as
part of a separate JIRA? I didn't do this here because both call-sites are in
different packages, and adding a dependency would be involved.
> StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-9736
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Metastore, Security
> Reporter: Mithun Radhakrishnan
> Assignee: Mithun Radhakrishnan
> Attachments: HIVE-9736.1.patch, HIVE-9736.2.patch, HIVE-9736.3.patch,
> HIVE-9736.4.patch, HIVE-9736.5.patch
>
>
> Consider a table partitioned by 2 keys (dt, region). Say a dt partition could
> have 10000 associated regions. Consider that the user does:
> {code:sql}
> ALTER TABLE my_table DROP PARTITION (dt='20150101');
> {code}
> As things stand now, {{StorageBasedAuthProvider}} will make individual
> {{DistributedFileSystem.listStatus()}} calls for each partition-directory,
> and authorize each one separately. It'd be faster to batch the calls, and
> examine multiple FileStatus objects at once.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
