[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15430252#comment-15430252
]
Jurriaan Mous commented on HBASE-16433:
---------------------------------------
{quote} I do not think this will fail at compile time if the proto file is
changed. And also, you can call the get method with a protobuf message with any
type and does not cause any compile error. I do not think this a good
practice.{quote}
Ah yes. I was looking a bit too much into interface forgetting how I got them.
We could also hardlink them to the generated code by depending on
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos.Get.class.getSimpleName().
> Remove AsyncRpcChannel related stuffs
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-16433
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16433
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-16433.patch
>
>
> AsyncRpcChannel can not be used by protobuf stub. We should implement the
> async logic along with the RpcChannel interface of protobuf.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
