wenjin272 commented on PR #930: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-agents/pull/930#issuecomment-5176971519
Thanks @weiqingy, this is broadly aligned with what I had in mind. What reviewers need is a clear explanation of the PR’s design intent and key decisions. Whether that comes from a developer-written Spec or an as-built description derived from the code is less important. What we should standardize is the content that this reviewer-facing description is expected to cover. I agree that failure behavior and test coverage should be included. For large or cross-cutting PRs, the description may also need diagrams or a concise explanation of the runtime flow to help reviewers understand the change without reconstructing everything from the diff. I have not yet formed a complete view of what the required structure should be. At this point, I think the minimum should include: - Design intent - Key decisions and trade-offs - Failure behavior - Test coverage We can refine this list as we gather more experience from additional PRs. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
