RocMarshal commented on PR #25218: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/25218#issuecomment-2874816057
> @RocMarshal are you planning to forward-port this as well? Or how do we ensure that we don't have a regression between 1.x and 2.x? Thanks @XComp As described in the background of our previous email discussion: - The current fix is intended for the 1.x series branches that are still under maintenance. - It's acceptable to port this patch to the currently maintained versions in the 1.x series. - For the 2.x series, porting this patch is not being considered (at least that was the consensus during the discussion). Based on historical comments, similar features in the 2.x series are expected to be introduced through a FLIP in order to achieve a more complete and reasonable design. Therefore, this issue still exists in the 2.x series branches, and there is currently no plan to fix it. Of course, this doesn't mean the patch can't be ported to the 2.x series. At the moment, we have two candidate approaches for supporting this feature in the 2.x series: - Introduce a more comprehensive and well-designed solution for 2.x based on a new FLIP. - Or directly port the current patch as-is. Please let me know your thoughts. CC @1996fanrui @ferenc-csaky @mxm -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
