XComp commented on PR #25866: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/25866#issuecomment-2594770400
Thanks @afedulov @He-Pin and @ferenc-csaky for your valuable input. My concern with including the pekko bump in 1.19.2 is that there is a proven change in functionality (users would have to add a flag to deal with more extensive memory usage as far as I understand). This goes against the contract for patch releases. For 1.20.1 it can be reasoned that we deal with it differently because of 1.20 being a LTS version. But for both, we might want to move the discussion into the ML rather than in a PR. It might be better to get a broader consensus from the community if we really want to put this into 1.19.2. Probably that's also a chance to discuss how the community should deal with 1.20 as the LTS version. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
