ferenc-csaky commented on PR #25866: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/25866#issuecomment-2586651631
@XComp I do not see any problem with your suggested approach for 1.19, it makes sense. I can also accept to release it with 1.20.2 to the 1.20 line, if everybody else agrees, but personally am a bit more reluctant about that. I guess that release will happen in a couple months after 1.20.1 best case scenario, and surely that will give us more time to see if the CI runs are more stable or not regarding this aspect. But even if not, based on my current investigation probably it will be some other necessary configuration to make, not some serious memory bug. And on the other hand, the pesky Netty3 CVEs won't go anywhere. @afedulov WDYT, any requirements from your side? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
