[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15718737#comment-15718737
 ] 

Dave Torok commented on FLINK-5039:
-----------------------------------

I have spent 2 days on this and HAVE THE SOLUTION.

Fix:  Bump Avro version to at least 1.7.7 from the current 1.7.6.

Root Cause.  Within "Schema.class" the "field" position is a TRANSIENT and does 
not get serialized by Kryo!

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1476  and specififcally mentions 
kyro

This was fixed in 1.7.7

This is also the cause for other GenericRecord issues such as the 'union' issue 
mentioned here 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37115618/apache-flink-union-operator-giving-wrong-response

PLEASE BUMP THIS ASAP!!!!

I have verified the fix in my local machine by replacing the Avro classes 
within the flink-dist_2.11-1.1.3.jar and it corrected my issue.

> Avro GenericRecord support is broken
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5039
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5039
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Batch Connectors and Input/Output Formats
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.3
>            Reporter: Bruno Dumon
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Avro GenericRecord support was introduced in FLINK-3691, but it seems like 
> the GenericRecords are not properly (de)serialized.
> This can be easily seen with a program like this:
> {noformat}
>   env.createInput(new AvroInputFormat<>(new Path("somefile.avro"), 
> GenericRecord.class))
>     .first(10)
>     .print();
> {noformat}
> which will print records in which all fields have the same value:
> {noformat}
> {"foo": 1478628723066, "bar": 1478628723066, "baz": 1478628723066, ...}
> {"foo": 1478628723179, "bar": 1478628723179, "baz": 1478628723179, ...}
> {noformat}
> If I'm not mistaken, the AvroInputFormat does essentially 
> TypeExtractor.getForClass(GenericRecord.class), but GenericRecords are not 
> POJOs.
> Furthermore, each GenericRecord contains a pointer to the record schema. I 
> guess the current naive approach will serialize this schema with each record, 
> which is quite inefficient (the schema is typically more complex and much 
> larger than the data). We probably need a TypeInformation and TypeSerializer 
> specific to Avro GenericRecords, which could just use avro serialization.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to