SmirAlex commented on PR #23521: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23521#issuecomment-1814359886
Thanks for the response, @Sxnan. I got your points. BTW, the reason why delivery guarantees of `RecordAttributes` elements to downstream operators was important to me is that I was testing the possibility to use them in order to properly implement Processing Time Temporal Join. I [described](https://lists.apache.org/thread/b3doy1gqchv45g2vjxcblv10two9gvsv) my thoughts about this in [FLIP-326](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-326%3A+Enhance+Watermark+to+Support+Processing-Time+Temporal+Join) discussion thread. Thus, if eventually it will be decided to reuse `RecordAttributes` logic to solve [FLINK-19830](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19830), the problem I described will arise one way or another. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
