Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1544#issuecomment-176133567
@fhueske and @ChengXiangLi: Sorry but I have to discuss this PR again. Do
we really want to have parts of the Table API written in Java and some other
parts written in Scala? Until this PR everything was written Scala. IMHO this
was nicer code.
Is it ok to refactor the packages again? I think "sql" and "calcite" should
not be contained in the package names. Instead dividing in into "logical" and
"physical" would make more sense.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
